Panel Fears Use of Biological, Nuclear or Other Unconventional Weapon By 2013
December 1, 2008 by national
Filed under Homeland Security News
If this is your first time visiting National Terror Alert you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed. The National terror Alert feed features breaking news, alerts and bulletins on demand and it's free of charge..
You will only see this message on your first visit to the site. Thanks for visiting!

An independent commission has concluded that terrorists will most likely carry out an attack with biological, nuclear or other unconventional weapons somewhere in the world in the next five years unless the United States and its allies act urgently to prevent that.
In a report to be released this week, the Congressionally mandated panel found that with countries like Iran and North Korea pursuing nuclear weapons programs, and with the risk of poorly secured biological pathogens growing, unconventional threats are fast outpacing the defenses arrayed to confront them.
“America’s margin of safety is shrinking, not growing,” the bipartisan panel concluded.
Prepared before last week’s deadly terrorist attacks in Mumbai — which American officials say were most likely carried out by Pakistani militant groups based in Kashmir — the report also singled out Pakistan as a top security priority for the coming Obama administration.
“Were one to map terrorism and weapons of mass destruction today, all roads would intersect in Pakistan,” the report states, citing the country’s terrorist haven along the border with Afghanistan and its tense relations with nuclear rival India.
“Pakistan is an ally, but there is a grave danger it could also be an unwitting source of a terrorist attack on the United States — possibly with weapons of mass destruction,” the report said.
The report is the result of a six-month study by the Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, which Congress created last spring in keeping with one of the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission.
Biological Weapons Greatest Concern
“The United States should be less concerned that terrorists will become biologists and far more concerned that biologists will become terrorists,” the report states.
The commission believes biological weapons are more likely to be obtained and used before nuclear or radioactive weapons because nuclear facilities are more carefully guarded. Civilian laboratories with potentially dangerous pathogens abound, however, and could easily be compromised.
“The biological threat is greater than the nuclear; the acquisition of deadly pathogens, and their weaponization and dissemination in aerosol form, would entail fewer technical hurdles than the theft or production of weapons-grade uranium or plutonium and its assembly into an improvised nuclear device,” states the report.
It notes that the U.S. government’s counterproliferation activities have been geared toward preventing nuclear terrorism. The commission recommends the prevention of biological terrorism be made a higher priority.
Study chairman Bob Graham said anthrax remains the most likely biological weapon. However, he told the AP that contagious diseases — like the flu strain that killed 40 million at the beginning of the 20th century — are looming threats. That virus has been recreated in scientific labs, and there remains no inoculation to protect against it if is stolen and released.
Graham said the threat of a terrorist attack using nuclear or biological weapons is growing “not because we have not done positive things but because adversaries are moving at an even faster pace to increase their access” to those materials.
He noted last week’s rampage by a small group of gunmen in Mumbai.
“If those people had had access to a biological or nuclear weapon they would have multiplied by orders of magnitude the deaths they could have inflicted,” he said.

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=548eb1d1-7b15-4573-a417-eaad147435b8)



I for one hope this will help the President maintain the PHI Grants in support of Public Healths ongoing and important involvement with bio-terrorism.
Heya Godspeed,
Agreed, there must be a response capability to try and minimize the damage.
At the same time, here’s hoping that there will be some time and effort expended on finding out where these guys are and moving to minimalize their activities and reduce the threat…
Notice I didn’t say “take ‘em out!!”
Although… Maybe that’s not a bad idea either. Set the example early. What a unique concept.
We need to immediately begin teaching basic civil defense skills in schools and other venues so that Americans become knowledgeable and proficient in surviving and recovering from such inevitable attacks.
We need a comprehensive civil defense program with the immediate restocking and identifying existing Cold War era shelters and tax incentives for new shelters to be built, supplies purchased and much more.
Both the Chinese and the Russians have massive civil defense programs because they are aware that someday they will need them to protect their populations and industries from a retalitory U.S. strike following their planned first strikes against us. Anyone who believes that the Cold War is over and we are not the primary target of thousands of nuclear warheads is simply foolish. Nothing has changed and in the past few years both Russian and Chinese intentions to destroy us have vastly increased while our “leaders” did nothing.
Right now, eight long years after 9-11 we are still completely unprotected and vulnerable to attack from our traditional enemies and many terror groups.
See “America’s need for civil defense” http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=36884
on WND.com
I proposed a Civil Defense Improvement Act in 2006 but despite all members of Congress receiving a copy of it not one offered to sponsor it. Perhaps they feel no need to protect their citizens since they all have space in government owned shelters.